Reviewer Form – Best Practice Continuum Track

Describes the identified need related to student mental health and well-being that the practice is intended to address and explains specifically how the practice will address this need.  The applicant describes how the need was identified, explains who was involved in the identification process, and lists the sources of information that support the identified need.

Describes practice stakeholders and why they were engaged or partnered with.

Describes any sources (i.e., theories, guidelines, standards, etc.) that were used to develop and/or implement the practice.  The applicant provides a citation for the source(s), explains why the source(s) was selected, and describe how the practice was informed by the source(s).

Describes what the practice is intended to achieve, including how it will benefit the key population.

Describes initial practice successes or other indicators that demonstrate the practice is working.

Explains a plan to identify lessons learned that will be used to improve their practice, as an indicator of quality improvement.

Describes the identified need related to student mental health and well-being that the practice is intended to address and explains specifically how the practice will address this need.  The applicant describes how the need was identified, explains who was involved in the identification process, and lists the sources of information that support the identified need.

Describes the practice’s campus and community stakeholders, explain why they were engaged or partnered with, and describe how stakeholders, especially students, were engaged or partnered with in the practice processes.

Describes any sources (i.e., theories, guidelines, standards, etc.) that were used to develop and/or implement the practice and the source(s) is grounded in evidence, informed by theoretical approaches, or from an authoritative or credible source(s).  The applicant provides a citation for the source(s), explains why the source(s) was selected, and describes how the practice was informed by the source(s).

A. Describes the evaluation plan, including all the following:

I. States the duration of the evaluation since practice implementation.

II. Explains who participated or is participating in the evaluation.

III. Lists the evaluation question(s) or aim(s).

IV. Lists the metrics that will be measured or are in the process of being measured to demonstrate the practice is effective.

V. Describes the methods or tools that are being used or will be used to collect data.

VI. Explains how these data will be or are being analyzed.

B. Provides a brief summary of emerging evaluation results or outcomes demonstrating the effectiveness of the practice.

Describes the process used to identify lessons learned to improve their practice, as an indicator of quality improvement.

Describes any plans that demonstrate potential for the practice to be maintained.  

Describes the identified need related to student mental health and well-being that the practice is intended to address and explains specifically how the practice will address this need.  The applicant describes how the need was identified, explains who was involved in the identification process, and lists the sources of information that support the identified need.

Describes the practice’s campus and community stakeholders, explain why they were engaged or partnered with, and describe how stakeholders, especially students, were engaged or partnered  with in the practice processes.

Describes the sources (i.e., theories, guidelines, standards, etc.) that were used to develop and/or implement the practice.  The practice is informed by theoretical approaches and practice-based evidence/research or (controlled) research.  The applicant provides a citation for the source(s), explain why the source(s) was selected, and describe how the practice was informed by the source(s).

Describes the evaluation plan, including all the following:

a. States the duration of the evaluation since practice implementation.

b. Explain who participated or is participating in the evaluation.

c. Lists the evaluation question(s) or aim(s).

d. Lists the metrics that were measured to demonstrate the effectiveness of the practice.

e. Describes the methods or tools used to collect data

f. Explains how these data were analysed.

Provide a summary of evaluation results that clearly link positive outcomes to the practice.

Describes how a quality improvement process was implemented.  The applicant explains who was involved in this process, describes any techniques, models, or tools that were used to implement this process, and provides a description of changes made to the practice because of this process.

Describes how the practice has been maintained over time to achieve desired outcomes. States the duration of the practice since start of implementation.

Describes the identified need related to student mental health and well-being that the practice is intended to address and explains specifically how the practice will address this need.  The applicant describes how the need was identified, explains who was involved in the identification process, and lists the sources of information that support the identified need.

Describes the practice’s campus and community stakeholders, explain why they were engaged or partnered with, and describe how stakeholders, especially students, were engaged or partnered  with in the practice processes.

Describes the sources (i.e., theories, guidelines, standards, etc.) that were used to develop and/or implement the practice.  The practice is informed by theoretical approaches and practice-based evidence/research or (controlled) research.  The applicant provides a citation for the source(s), explain why the source(s) was selected, and describe how the practice was informed by the source(s).

Describes the evaluation plan, including all the following:

a. States the duration of the evaluation since practice implementation.

b. Explain who participated or is participating in the evaluation.

c. Lists the evaluation question(s) or aim(s).

d. Lists the metrics that were measured to demonstrate the effectiveness of the practice.

e. Describes the methods or tools used to collect data

f. Explains how these data were analysed.

Describes how a quality improvement process was implemented.  The applicant explains who was involved in this process, describe any techniques, models, or tools that were used to implement this process, and provides a description of changes made to the practice because of this process.

Presents evaluation results that clearly and/or consistently link positive outcomes and/or impacts to the practice.  Includes the time period over which the outcomes and other variables were measured.

Describes how the practice was maintained and achieved desired outcomes over time.  States the duration of the practice since the start of implementation.

Describes how the practice has been implemented in another setting or with a different population and demonstrates that the results were replicated.  The applicant describe the replication process and any adaptations that were made to the original practice and provides a summary of evaluation results that demonstrate the practice results were replicated.

Describes how the practice has been externally validated to contribute to improving the evidence base, such as through a peer review process, external evaluation, or dissemination of a report or product.  The applicant provides citations and/or links to any articles, journals, reports, external evaluations, etc.

Provides an explanation of how the practice intended to improve outcomes for one or more equity-deserving group(s).